Sorry - shoes all the way. I can live with my heavily culled collection of bags in black, brown, dark blue and red, but shoes are another thing entirely since I'm searching for the holy grail of shoes: fashionable shoes that actually are comfortable.
So hard to choose! But I'd say bags, because I buy more of them--mostly because many are oddball vintage thing, and thus cheaper, and (as Phyllis says) because they don't need to fit.
The question is not fair. Everyone needs atleast a pair of shoes or two. But -I love bags more. With a large bag you can hide your shoes but not the other way around.
Linda Grant is a novelist and journalist. She won the Orange Prize for Fiction in 2000 and the Lettre Ulysses Prize for Literary Reportage in 2006. She writes for the Guardian, Telegraph and Vogue. Her latest novel, The Clothes on Their Backs was shortlisted for the 2008 Man Booker Prize. For further information including upcoming literary festivals bookstore readings etc see her website at www.lindagrant.co.uk
The People on the Street (Winner of the Lettre Ulysses Prize for Literary Reportage 2006)
Still Here (Fiction 2002)
When I Lived in Modern Times (Winner of the Orange Prize for Fiction 2000)
Remind Me Who I Am Again (Non-fiction 1998)
The Cast Iron Shore (Fiction 1996)
Sexing the Millenium (Non-Fiction 1993)
This blog believes
'A good handbag makes the outfit.'
'Only the rich can afford cheap shoes'
'The only thing worse than being skint is looking as if you're skint.'
'A new dress is a great help in all circumstances.' (Noel Streatfeild)
'The only true and lasting meaning of the struggle for life lies in the individual, in his modest peculiarities and his right to these peculiarities.' (Vasily Grossman, Life and Fate.)
10 comments:
Couldn't care less about bags - SHOES & HATS are what I love.
Bags all the way! (I'm a man - can I still participate?)
Sorry - shoes all the way. I can live with my heavily culled collection of bags in black, brown, dark blue and red, but shoes are another thing entirely since I'm searching for the holy grail of shoes: fashionable shoes that actually are comfortable.
I would say both,I cant live without both.
Bags because they don't need to fit.
So hard to choose! But I'd say bags, because I buy more of them--mostly because many are oddball vintage thing, and thus cheaper, and (as Phyllis says) because they don't need to fit.
I'm not going to participate; I couldn't choose.
I can definitely live without bags... but definitely not without shoes. Though I envision there being a day where I won't have to make that choice...
The question is not fair. Everyone needs atleast a pair of shoes or two. But -I love bags more. With a large bag you can hide your shoes but not the other way around.
Bags. I am crazy about all kinds of bags! I have narrow feet that are difficult to fit, or else I'd have to say BOTH!
Post a Comment