Because you can't have depths without surfaces.
Linda Grant, thinking about clothes, books and other matters.

Tuesday, 8 January 2008

Poll: Bags or shoes


A very simple poll - which fabulous purchases can you least do without, bags or shoes. As ever, I will express my own views next week.

10 comments:

Bronwyn said...

Couldn't care less about bags - SHOES & HATS are what I love.

Overpriced Designer Man Bag said...

Bags all the way! (I'm a man - can I still participate?)

Toby Wollin said...

Sorry - shoes all the way. I can live with my heavily culled collection of bags in black, brown, dark blue and red, but shoes are another thing entirely since I'm searching for the holy grail of shoes: fashionable shoes that actually are comfortable.

Kathy said...

I would say both,I cant live without both.

Phyllis said...

Bags because they don't need to fit.

Flavia said...

So hard to choose! But I'd say bags, because I buy more of them--mostly because many are oddball vintage thing, and thus cheaper, and (as Phyllis says) because they don't need to fit.

enc said...

I'm not going to participate; I couldn't choose.

Anonymous said...

I can definitely live without bags... but definitely not without shoes. Though I envision there being a day where I won't have to make that choice...

morty said...

The question is not fair. Everyone needs atleast a pair of shoes or two. But -I love bags more. With a large bag you can hide your shoes but not the other way around.

greeneyes said...

Bags. I am crazy about all kinds of bags! I have narrow feet that are difficult to fit, or else I'd have to say BOTH!