Fashion is cleavage, style is collarbones. Betty Sue
5 comments:
Anonymous
said...
This is a lovely aphorism, but at first it bothered me, because it brought to mind images such as Amy Winehouse before and after (she was a beautiful, curvy but not remotely overweight young woman). But then I got thinking about "good bones", not just of a human face and form that ages well, but also of a building, or of tailoring (a word that does come from stonecutting, and refers to structure).
Yes, but I don't think you are meant to have a medical display of said bones; a discreet hint of cleavage or collar bones is what is stylish surely? Enough of the size zero worship.
I think the photo is horribly wrong. It looks so very painful and surely style is not painful. Fashion can be painful, but style shouldn't be.
Also I dislike the idea that a body part can be un-stylish. Cleavage can be wonderfully stylish, timeless even as it's a symbol of femininity. And yes it can be vulgar, but so can collar bones or anything else we choose to fetishize .
Linda Grant is a novelist and journalist. She won the Orange Prize for Fiction in 2000 and the Lettre Ulysses Prize for Literary Reportage in 2006. She writes for the Guardian, Telegraph and Vogue. Her latest novel, The Clothes on Their Backs was shortlisted for the 2008 Man Booker Prize. For further information including upcoming literary festivals bookstore readings etc see her website at www.lindagrant.co.uk
The People on the Street (Winner of the Lettre Ulysses Prize for Literary Reportage 2006)
Still Here (Fiction 2002)
When I Lived in Modern Times (Winner of the Orange Prize for Fiction 2000)
Remind Me Who I Am Again (Non-fiction 1998)
The Cast Iron Shore (Fiction 1996)
Sexing the Millenium (Non-Fiction 1993)
This blog believes
'A good handbag makes the outfit.'
'Only the rich can afford cheap shoes'
'The only thing worse than being skint is looking as if you're skint.'
'A new dress is a great help in all circumstances.' (Noel Streatfeild)
'The only true and lasting meaning of the struggle for life lies in the individual, in his modest peculiarities and his right to these peculiarities.' (Vasily Grossman, Life and Fate.)
5 comments:
This is a lovely aphorism, but at first it bothered me, because it brought to mind images such as Amy Winehouse before and after (she was a beautiful, curvy but not remotely overweight young woman). But then I got thinking about "good bones", not just of a human face and form that ages well, but also of a building, or of tailoring (a word that does come from stonecutting, and refers to structure).
That photo is a brilliant illustration of the idea. I like how it de-vulgarizes.
Yes, but I don't think you are meant to have a medical display of said bones; a discreet hint of cleavage or collar bones is what is stylish surely? Enough of the size zero worship.
I think the photo is horribly wrong. It looks so very painful and surely style is not painful. Fashion can be painful, but style shouldn't be.
Also I dislike the idea that a body part can be un-stylish. Cleavage can be wonderfully stylish, timeless even as it's a symbol of femininity. And yes it can be vulgar, but so can collar bones or anything else we choose to fetishize .
That is a perfect description of fashion vs style,but there's nothing stylish about the emaciated model in the accompanying photo.
Post a Comment